Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-24 dismissed

Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax vs Bharat V. Patel

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

A Chairman and Managing Director of an Indian subsidiary of a US company received cash on redemption of Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs) granted by the parent company in 1991-96, claimed as non-taxable. The Revenue sought to tax it as a perquisite under the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that absent an express statutory provision making such receipt taxable, the employee cannot be subjected to tax. The amendment of 1999 defining and taxing such security transfers applied only from 2000 onwards and cannot operate retrospectively. Therefore, the amount received in 1997 was not taxable as income.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation Income Tax Capital Gains Employee Perquisites Stock Appreciation Rights Statutory Interpretation Retrospective Application

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login