Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-10 dismissed

Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

A registered society representing Adivasis challenged the application of election laws in Sundargarh Scheduled Area, Odisha, contending that only Scheduled Tribes can settle, vote, or contest elections there without prior Governor notification. The Supreme Court held that Central and State laws apply to Scheduled Areas unless the Governor specifically excludes or modifies them. Non-Tribals have constitutional rights to settle and vote under Article 19(1)(e) and the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The Governor's powers under the Fifth Schedule cannot override Fundamental Rights. All constituencies need not be reserved for Scheduled Tribes. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Scheduled Areas Fifth Schedule Fundamental Rights Electoral Law Representation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login