Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-04 disposed

Arcelormittal India Private Limited vs Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

In this case involving competing resolution plans for Essar Steel India Limited under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Supreme Court clarified the scope and application of Section 29A, which bars certain ineligible persons from submitting resolution plans. The Court held that the relevant date for determining ineligibility is the time of submission of the resolution plan. Importantly, merely divesting shares or control of non-performing assets does not cure ineligibility; the only cure is payment of all overdue amounts before plan submission. The Court emphasized that the corporate veil can be pierced to identify persons acting jointly or in concert, including through family relationships and group company structures. The Court set aside findings that Numetal was eligible and gave both applicants an opportunity to pay off related non-performing debts within two weeks to cure their ineligibility, allowing them to resubmit plans for the Committee of Creditors' consideration.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Corporate Restructuring Securities Regulation SEBI Takeover Regulations Promoter Disqualification Non-Performing Assets Corporate Veil Piercing Resolution Planning

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login