Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-04 partly_allowed

Arcelormittal India Private Limited vs Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court resolved the first major interpretation of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which disqualifies certain persons from submitting resolution plans for distressed companies. The judgment concerns two bidders—Arcelor Mittal India (AMIPL) and Numetal—seeking to acquire Essar Steel India Limited (ESIL). The Court held that Section 29A(c) bars resolution applicants connected to other companies with unpaid debts classified as non-performing assets (NPAs) for over one year, unless those debts are paid before plan submission. Applying the corporate veil doctrine, the Court found both applicants ineligible because they were connected to NPA companies. However, demonstrating judicial pragmatism, the Court gave both applicants two weeks to pay off the related NPAs to become eligible, allowing them a final opportunity to resubmit plans."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Eligibility of Resolution Applicants Section 29A IBC Non-Performing Assets Corporate Veil Connected Persons

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login