Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-09-15 allowed

Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India & Anr vs Tanya Energy Enterprises through its Managing Partner, Shri Alluri Lakshmi Narasimha Varma

Bench: 2 — Dipankar Datta, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

SBI lent money to Tanya Energy Enterprises (respondent) against seven mortgaged properties. After default, SBI initiated recovery proceedings and introduced an OTS (One Time Settlement) scheme in 2020. The respondent applied for OTS on 10 November 2020 without paying the mandatory 5% upfront payment required by the scheme. SBI rejected the application; the respondent challenged this in the High Court. The High Court directed reconsideration, finding the borrower eligible. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that non-compliance with the mandatory upfront payment condition made the application fundamentally defective and ineligible for processing. The Court upheld the rejection while permitting the borrower to submit a fresh OTS proposal to the Bank outside the expired 2020 scheme.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Debt Recovery Banking Law SARFAESI Act One Time Settlement Scheme Administrative Law Securities and Mortgages

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login