Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-19 partly_allowed

Atul Thakur vs State of Himachal Pradesh etc. etc

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

A man was killed during a sudden fight at a social gathering when the appellant stabbed him with a knife. The High Court convicted the appellant of murder under Section 302 IPC, but the Supreme Court reversed this, finding the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation in a social setting between friends. The Court applied Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, holding that multiple knife blows and the use of a weapon are not, by themselves, determinative factors. The Court reduced the offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC and enhanced the sentence to 10 years imprisonment, considering the seriousness of the attack but recognizing the sudden, unprovoked nature of the quarrel and the appellant's subsequent attempts to assist the victim.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Homicide Murder vs. Culpable Homicide Exception 4 Section 300 IPC Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login