Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-11 remanded

B.K. Educational Services Private Limited vs Parag Gupta And Associates

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications under Sections 7 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 from the Code's inception (December 1, 2016) via Section 433 of the Companies Act, 2013. The expression "debt due" in the Code refers only to debts not barred by limitation. Section 238A (inserted June 6, 2018), clarifying this position, is retrospective. An application for corporate insolvency cannot revive a time-barred debt. Article 137 of the Limitation Act (three-year period) applies, subject to condonation under Section 5. The appeals were remanded to the NCLAT for fresh decision in light of this judgment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Limitation Act National Company Law Tribunal Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Statute of Limitations Companies Act Procedural Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login