Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-19 partly_allowed

Balvir Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

On 11 March 1998, a Scheduled Caste man named Mohan Mehtar was shot and killed near a railway colony in Madhya Pradesh. Three eyewitnesses testified that they saw accused Harnam Singh fire a country-made pistol at Mohan's face from very close range, causing instant death, while co-accused Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh held the victim. The Supreme Court affirmed Harnam Singh's conviction for murder, rejecting arguments that minor inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts about distance and injury details undermined credibility. However, the Court acquitted Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh, finding no proof they shared a common intention to murder—they were unarmed and merely held the victim without evidence of pre-arranged planning.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Murder Common Intention Eyewitness Testimony Forensic Evidence Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Illegal Firearms

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login