Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-19 partly_allowed

Balvir Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

A scheduled caste man was shot and killed by accused Harnam Singh at close range with a country-made pistol in front of three eyewitnesses in 1998. Harnam Singh and two others (Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh) were convicted of murder for life. On appeal, the Supreme Court upheld Harnam Singh's conviction based on consistent eyewitness testimony despite minor discrepancies with medical evidence and inconclusive ballistic testing. However, it acquitted Balvir Singh and Bhav Singh, finding insufficient evidence that they shared a common intention to murder—merely catching the victim without attacking him did not establish the pre-arranged plan required under Section 34 IPC.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Murder Section 34 IPC Common Intention Medical Evidence vs Oral Evidence Ballistic Evidence Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Arms Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login