Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-03 allowed

Bangalore Development Authority & Anr vs State of Karnataka & Anr

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Bangalore Development Authority issued a preliminary notification under Section 17 of the BDA Act in 2008 to acquire land for planned urban development (Dr. K. Shivaram Karanth Layout). After five years without issuing a final notification, landowners filed writ petitions, and the High Court quashed the notification, applying a two-year timeframe from the Land Acquisition Act. The Supreme Court upheld the notification, holding that the BDA Act is self-contained and the Land Acquisition Act's timeframe provisions do not apply. Although delay occurred due to irregularities (illegal proposed land exclusions and government inquiries), the Court directed authorities to proceed with the acquisition, emphasizing that planned development cannot be thwarted by landowner wrongdoing or official misconduct.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Urban Development Administrative Law Constitutional Law Statutory Interpretation Public Interest Planned Development

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login