Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-10-16 allowed

Bank of Rajasthan Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Pankaj Mithal

In Brief

A Scheduled Bank purchased government securities as stock-in-trade and paid interest for the "broken period" (accrued interest between coupon dates) to sellers. It deducted this interest as revenue expenditure. The Income Tax Commissioner disallowed the deduction, relying on a prior Supreme Court judgment (Vijaya Bank Ltd.). The Appellate Tribunal allowed the deduction, but the High Court reversed it. The Supreme Court held that broken period interest is revenue expenditure, not capital, when securities are held as stock-in-trade. Securities acquired by banks as part of normal banking business are stock-in-trade, not investments. The repealed Sections 18–21 no longer apply. The Vijaya Bank judgment (on investment interest) does not govern cases assessed under the profits/business head after 1989. Appeals allowed; tribunal decision restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Banking Law Business Deductions Capital vs. Revenue Expenditure Stock-in-Trade vs. Investment Interest on Securities Statutory Liquidity Ratio

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login