Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-28 partly_allowed

Chhannu Lal Verma vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bench: 3 — Kurian Joseph, Deepak Gupta, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

Chhannu Lal Verma was convicted of murdering three persons and attempting to murder another. The trial court and High Court imposed the death penalty, finding it a 'rarest of rare case'. The Supreme Court held that while the crime was serious, procedural safeguards were violated (no bifurcated sentencing hearing), and critical mitigating factors were overlooked—particularly the convict's good conduct in jail over four years, lack of prior criminal record, and the false rape allegation that motivated the crime. The Court applied the principle that death is the exception, not the rule, and that life imprisonment must be the default unless reformation is impossible. Finding reformation capacity existed, the Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, noting systemic inconsistencies in applying capital punishment principles.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Death Penalty Sentencing Murder Rarest of Rare Cases Constitutional Law Penology

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login