Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-09 disposed

Chitra Sharma and Ors vs Union of India and Ors

Bench: 3 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Homebuyers of Jaypee Infratech projects challenged the exclusion of their interests during corporate insolvency proceedings. The Supreme Court held that the June 2018 Insolvency Ordinance statutorily recognizes homebuyers as financial creditors with voting rights in the Committee of Creditors. The Court revived the 180-day CIRP period to allow fresh consideration by a reconstituted committee including homebuyers, but barred the promoters (JAL) from participating under Section 29A eligibility restrictions. The Court rejected claims for immediate refund disbursement, emphasizing the need for a composite resolution plan protecting all stakeholders. It directed the RBI to proceed with insolvency against JAL and permitted fresh bid invitations for resolution, securing homebuyers' interests while maintaining IBC discipline.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Homebuyers Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Financial Creditors Consumer Protection Real Estate Section 29A Eligibility Bar Committee of Creditors Article 142 of Constitution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login