Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-25 allowed

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh vs Khurana Oleo Chemical

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This case concerns whether Khurana Oleo Chemical is entitled to area-based excise exemption after taking over M/s. Stanley Controls. The Revenue argued that Stanley Controls was non-functional and had ceased manufacturing when taken over, and that the acquisition was motivated solely by the desire to claim exemption benefits under a notification. The Supreme Court found that the Tribunal failed to address this critical contention despite findings by the primary and appellate authorities. The Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for the Tribunal to reconsider whether the takeover met the genuine functional requirements for exemption eligibility.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Customs and Excise Area-based Exemption Tax Benefits Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login