Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-21 allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad vs Gujarat Cypromet Ltd

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The assessee claimed a deduction for interest of Rs.2,51,31,154 payable to IDBI Bank under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Rather than actually paying the interest, the assessee obtained a fresh loan of Rs.8 crores from IDBI and adjusted the unpaid interest against this new loan. The Supreme Court held that such conversion or adjustment of interest into a loan does not satisfy the statutory requirement of 'actual payment' under Section 43B(d). Explanation 3C to Section 43B, inserted by the Finance Act, 2006, explicitly clarifies that interest converted into a loan shall not be deemed to have been actually paid. The appeal was allowed and the Assessing Officer's disallowance was upheld.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Deduction Interest Payment Finance Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login