Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-02 allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs S. Ajit Kumar

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

The Income Tax Department searched the assessee's premises in 2002 and simultaneously surveyed the builder's premises, revealing undisclosed cash payments of Rs 95.16 lakhs. The Assessing Officer added this as undisclosed income under block assessment. The High Court had set aside this addition, holding that survey evidence at a third party's premises could not be used in the assessee's block assessment. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that material found in surveys simultaneously conducted at connected persons' premises during a search can be used in block assessment as it falls within "other materials available with the Assessing Officer and relatable to such evidence" under Section 158BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Tax Law Income Tax Assessment Block Assessment Search and Seizure Undisclosed Income Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login