Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-17 allowed

Competition Commission of India vs Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that Thomas Cook (India) Ltd, its subsidiary Thomas Cook Insurance Services, and Sterling Holiday Resorts India undertook a composite combination comprising demerger, amalgamation, share subscriptions, share purchases, and stock exchange market purchases on the same day to acquire control of Sterling. Although the companies notified only the demerger and amalgamation, market purchases (9.93% stake) and other acquisitions were not notified, relying on target-based exemption for smaller enterprises. The Court ruled that multiple interconnected transactions achieving a single objective constitute a composite combination requiring unified notification. Substance prevails over form; individual components cannot be exempted in isolation. The penalty of Rs. 1 crore for non-compliance was upheld as justified, with mens rea irrelevant to civil penalty for statutory breach.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Competition Law Mergers and Combinations Notification Requirements Exemptions Administrative Penalties Regulatory Compliance Composite Transactions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login