Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-14 allowed

Council of Architecture vs Academic Society of Architects (TASA) & Ors

Bench: 2 — V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

The Council of Architecture challenged a High Court order that quashed minimum standards of architectural education prescriptions (2017 and 2018) on the ground that prior Central Government approval under Section 45 of The Architects Act, 1972 was required. The Supreme Court held that while regulations must have such approval, Section 21 permits the Council to prescribe minimum standards of architectural education either by formal regulations or otherwise. The requirement of approval applies only when standards are issued as formal regulations, not to communications or prescriptions. The Court also found that the respondent (a society of teaching faculty) lacked locus standi to challenge communications addressed to institutions, and that no institution had contested them. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's order was set aside."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Professional Regulation Architectural Education Standing and Locus Standi Regulatory Authority Powers

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login