Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-01 allowed

Danamma @ Suman Surpur & Anr vs Amar & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Two daughters claimed equal share in their father's joint family property after his 2001 death. The daughters were born before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Lower courts denied their claim, holding that daughters born before the Act's enactment cannot be coparceners. The Supreme Court allowed their appeal, holding that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 grants daughters coparcenary rights by birth, equal to sons. These rights apply to all living daughters of living coparceners as on 9 September 2005, regardless of birth date. The daughters became entitled to equal shares alongside sons in the partition proceeding.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Succession Coparcenary Gender Equality Family Law Joint Family Partition Women's Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login