Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-01 partly_allowed

Deepak vs State of Uttar Pradesh (Now Uttarakhand)

Bench: 3 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court considered whether the appellant was correctly convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) for delivering a single sword blow to his neighbour over a neighbourhood dispute concerning loud music. The trial court had acquitted the appellant, but the High Court reversed this and convicted him for murder. The Supreme Court found that while the injury was caused and death ensued, the circumstances—the lack of premeditation, the single blow, the short duration, and the absence of any second assault—did not demonstrate an intention to kill. The Court modified the conviction from murder to causing death by a rash or negligent act (Section 304 Part-II IPC) and released the appellant having regard to his time in custody."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder and Culpable Homicide Evidence Eyewitness Testimony Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login