Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-09 allowed

DILIP HARIRAMANI vs BANK OF BARODA

Bench: 2 — Ajay Rastogi, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

Dilip Hariramani, a partner in a partnership firm M/s. Global Packaging, was convicted along with the authorized signatory under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheques issued by the firm in repayment of a bank loan. The Supreme Court set aside his conviction, holding that a partner cannot be convicted on mere partnership status or as a guarantor. Vicarious liability under Section 141 requires proof that the partner was in overall control of the firm's day-to-day business and arises only when the firm is the primary offender. Without such evidence and without the firm being made an accused, the conviction was unsustainable. The appellant was acquitted.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Negotiable Instruments Vicarious Liability Partnership Section 141 NI Act Cheque Dishonour

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login