Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-09-17 dismissed

Director of Income Tax, New Delhi vs M/s. Mitsubishi Corporation

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

A non-resident foreign corporation claimed it was not liable for interest on short payment of advance tax when Indian payers failed to deduct tax at source. The Supreme Court held that prior to the 2012 amendment to Section 209(1)(d), assessees could reduce advance tax by the amount of tax 'deductible or collectible' at source, even if actual deduction did not occur. Therefore, the corporation had no advance tax liability and could not be charged interest under Section 234B. The Court rejected interpreting the statute in isolation, holding that the 2012 amendment—requiring payment even when tax was not deducted—confirms this pre-amendment interpretation. The Revenue retains remedies against defaulting payers under Section 201.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Advance Tax Interest for Default Tax at Source Statutory Interpretation Construction of Statutes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login