Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-03 dismissed

Director, Prasar Bharati vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Thiruvananthapuram

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

Prasar Bharati (Doordarshan) paid commission to advertising agencies for telecasting advertisements under a written agreement. The Income Tax Department contended that these payments attracted tax deduction obligations under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Prasar Bharati argued the payments were not 'commission' but principal-to-principal transactions. The Supreme Court upheld the Department's position, holding that the agreement expressly termed the payments as 'commission', establishing a principal-agent relationship, and thus Section 194H deduction obligations applied. The Court dismissed Prasar Bharati's appeals, confirming it was obligated to deduct tax at source from agency payments.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) Commission Agency Advertising

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login