Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-09-24 dismissed

Divyangnakumari Harisinh Parmar and Ors vs Union of India and Ors

Bench: 3 — Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

In Brief

Appellants, descendants of landholders who received grants (Alvaras) from the Portuguese administration in Dadra and Nagar Haveli between 1923-1930, challenged the Collector's 1974 order rescinding those grants for non-cultivation. The lower courts had accepted their pleas of waiver and acquiescence by the administration due to delay. The Supreme Court held that the Organizacao Agraria (OA), 1919—a special law governing land grants in Dadra and Nagar Haveli—is the applicable law, not the general Portuguese Land Code. Article 12 of the OA, requiring cultivation of granted lands, is a mandatory statutory provision rooted in public policy and cannot be waived. Mere administrative delay does not constitute waiver or acquiescence. The High Court was justified in reversing the concurrent findings of the lower courts, which were vitiated by reliance on unsubstantiated oral testimony and misinterpretation of a Lisbon Council judgment. The Collector's rescission order, passed after proper inquiry and opportunity, was legally valid. Appeals dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Law Property Rights Statutory Interpretation Public Policy Administrative Law Colonial Law Waiver and Estoppel Procedure and Evidence Second Appeals Land Reforms

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login