Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-19 disposed

Essel Infra Projects Ltd. through its Authorized Representative vs State of Madhya Pradesh Acting through its Director

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed delays in arbitration proceedings under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, where cases were taking up to five years or more to resolve. The Court directed that such proceedings should ordinarily not exceed one to two years. The Tribunal Chairman must ensure timely disposal and communicate resource shortages to the State Government for prompt action. Revision petitions in the High Court must be disposed of within two years. If delays persist despite these directions, parties may approach the High Court Chief Justice for intervention. The Court emphasized that statutory amendments should be considered if these timelines cannot be achieved."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Dispute Resolution Tribunal Practice and Procedure Judicial Administration Court Delays

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login