Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-11-29 partly_allowed

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA vs PRATAP KUNDU

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan, M.R. Shah

In Brief

The Food Corporation of India contracted with Pratap Kundu for handling and transport services at its Bikna Depot. The contractor quoted 471% above scheduled rates (ASOR) for all items, including casual labour supply. A pending Supreme Court case determined that casual labourers were entitled to Class IV employee wages. In 2010, the Supreme Court resolved the wage dispute, directing FCI to pay fixed wages directly to workers. The contractor later claimed 471% ASOR on the wages he had paid. The High Court partly referred the matter back for clarification but also directed determination of the contractor's profit. The Supreme Court held that the contractor is not entitled to 471% ASOR for casual labour; wages must follow the 2010 order. The contractor is entitled only to reimbursement of actual wages paid, not to profit determination. FCI's appeal was partly allowed; the contractor's appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Contract Law Administrative Law Wages Casual Labour

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login