Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-15 allowed

Gaurav Kumar @ Monu vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether juvenile justice rules applicable to age determination in criminal proceedings apply retrospectively. The appellant was convicted of murder in 2000 but claimed juvenility years later. The High Court dismissed his plea based on a birth certificate showing he was 18+ on the date of the incident. The Court held that only the 2001 Rules (not the 2007 Rules) were applicable, as the 2007 Rules came after the incident. The Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the matter for reconsideration of juvenility using the correct applicable rules and all available evidence.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Age Determination Criminal Appeal Retrospective Application of Rules Procedural Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login