Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-16 allowed

General Manager (Project), National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd vs Prakash Chand Pradhan & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that Section 3-G of the National Highways Act, 1956 exclusively vests the appointment of arbitrators in the Central Government for compensation disputes. Although the Act states that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies 'subject to the provisions of this Act', the phrase 'subject to' means the general arbitration provisions are subordinate to the special provision in Section 3-G. Therefore, Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act does not apply. If the Central Government fails to appoint an arbitrator within a reasonable time, the remedy is a writ petition or suit, not a Section 11 application. The Court set aside the lower judgment and allowed both appeals."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation National Highways Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login