Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-06-15 allowed

Halke Ram & Anr vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Halke Ram and another were convicted by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh for murder (Section 302 IPC, read with Section 34) after it reversed the trial court's acquittal. The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and acquitted them. The Court held that appeals against acquittal require extreme caution; the presumption of innocence is reinforced by acquittal and must not be lightly disturbed. The trial court had found the prosecution failed to prove the incident occurred when alleged (based on post-mortem findings and distance factors). The High Court had not addressed these reasons. Additionally, the prosecution failed to examine key eyewitnesses cited in the charge sheet and did not produce the deceased's blood-stained clothes despite the violent nature of the alleged assault. These gaps entitled the appellants to the benefit of doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Appellate Jurisdiction Homicide Evidence Criminal Procedure Appeal Against Acquittal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login