Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-04 allowed

Hansaram vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for striking the deceased with a tangi (a farming tool) on the head, causing his death. The Supreme Court found no evidence of premeditation or intent to kill. The Court noted the appellant's own injuries sustained during the scuffle suggested he was acting in self-defence. The conviction was modified: the murder charge was set aside, and the appellant was convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC (causing death by act endangering life), with a sentence of seven years imprisonment. The appeal was allowed in part."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Homicide Self-Defence Evidence Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login