Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-18 disposed

Haryana Suraj Malting Ltd vs Phool Chand

Bench: 3 — Kurian

In Brief

This case settled a conflict in Supreme Court precedent regarding whether Labour Courts/Tribunals can set aside ex parte awards after they become enforceable. The Court held that Tribunals are not functus officio after an award becomes enforceable. If a party demonstrates sufficient cause for its absence before the Tribunal when proceedings were conducted ex parte, the Tribunal may entertain an application to set aside the award within a reasonable time. An award denying a party opportunity of hearing without sufficient cause is a nullity and cannot bind the party. The Industrial Disputes Act, as welfare legislation, grants Tribunals necessary ancillary powers to ensure justice. Mere enforceability does not make an award binding; it must comply with natural justice principles.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Industrial Disputes Act Labour and Industrial Law Civil Procedure Natural Justice Ex Parte Awards Functus Officio Doctrine

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login