Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Friday, 30 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-08 dismissed

Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr vs Jagdeep Singh

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

The Haryana Urban Development Authority demanded additional payment from a plot allottee citing a cost increase in the underlying land. The allotment letter allowed additional price only if a competent authority awarded enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. Since the land was transferred (not acquired) by the State, and no statutory award was made, the courts below rightly rejected the demand. The Supreme Court upheld this reasoning, finding no merit in the appeal. The Court dismissed the appeal as frivolous, noting the Authority persisted after a prior Supreme Court decision on identical facts. Exemplary costs of ₹1,00,000 were imposed on the Authority, with ₹50,000 compensation to the respondent, to be recovered from responsible officers.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Real Property Contract - Allotment Conditions Administrative Law Cost - Frivolous Litigation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login