Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-07-20 allowed

Hetchin Haokip vs State of Manipur and Ors

Bench: 3 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Hetchin Haokip's husband was detained under the National Security Act, 1980. The question was whether the District Magistrate violated Section 3(4) by reporting the detention to the State Government five days after issuing the order, rather than "forthwith" (immediately). The High Court dismissed her writ petition. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that "forthwith" means within reasonable time without undue delay, not instantaneously. However, it does not grant a 12-day window. The detaining authority must report at the earliest possible time; any delay must be justified by unavoidable circumstances. Since the District Magistrate offered no explanation for the five-day delay, the detention order was set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Preventive Detention National Security Act Constitutional Law Article 22 Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login