Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-25 partly_allowed

High Court of Hyderabad For The State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Its Registrar General Etc vs P. Murali Mohana Reddy and Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Four ad-hoc Fast Track Court District Judges in Andhra Pradesh challenged their exclusion from regularisation as Additional District Judges. The High Court allowed their writ petitions on the ground that no minimum qualifying marks requirement for the viva voce test was published in the advertisement or prescribed by the Rules. The Supreme Court partly upheld this, holding that the modalities in Brij Mohan Lal's case require only (1) qualifying marks in written examination, (2) participation in viva voce, and (3) a consolidated 40%/35% aggregate mark across both tests—not minimum marks in the interview alone. Two candidates scoring 99.7 and 99.3 (nearly the required 100) were treated as qualified; the other two, including one SC candidate, were given another opportunity to take the examination and interview within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Judicial Appointments Ad-Hoc Judges Regular Absorption Selection Procedure Administrative Law Statutory Rules Constitutional Article 142

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login