Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-13 partly_allowed

Hyderabad Urban Devt. Auth. (HUDA) & Anr vs S.B. Kirloskar & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the acquisition of land for the Outer Ring Road (ORR) around Hyderabad, which had been partially quashed by the High Court due to procedural defects and alleged mala fide in alignment changes. Though procedural violations were found, the Court refused to quash the acquisition because Rs. 6,000 crores had been invested and the road was already in heavy public use. Instead, it awarded enhanced compensation at SRO rates of Rs. 75 lakhs per acre for National Highway-adjacent land and Rs. 42 lakhs per acre for ORR-adjacent land, with statutory benefits, to all landowners uniformly. The Court directed HMDA to restore environmental damage caused by destruction of Nagulkunta Lake through creation of a replacement waterbody.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Constitutional Law Environmental Law Infrastructure Development Public Interest Mala Fide Action Compensation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login