Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-24 dismissed

Income Tax Officer Ward No. 16(2) vs Tech-Span India Private Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.K. Agrawal

In Brief

Tech-Span India Private Ltd., a software export company, filed a return claiming deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for assessment year 2001-02. After the original assessment was completed in 2004, the Revenue reopened the assessment in 2005 on the ground that the Section 10A deduction was allowed in excess. The assessee challenged this before the High Court, which quashed the reopening notice. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, holding that reopening an assessment based merely on a change of opinion regarding facts already considered during the original proceedings violates the legal principle against arbitrary reassessment power. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that the assessing officer must have tangible new material (not mere reinterpretation of known facts) to justify reopening."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Law Reassessment Change of Opinion Doctrine Section 147 IT Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login