Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-05 allowed

Inox Wind Ltd vs Thermocables Ltd

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

Inox Wind, a wind turbine manufacturer, issued purchase orders for cables to Thermocables Ltd with attached standard terms and conditions containing an arbitration clause. When cables arrived damaged and Thermocables refused replacement, Inox proposed arbitration. The High Court dismissed the appointment application, holding no valid arbitration agreement existed because the arbitration clause was not separately referenced. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that a general reference to a standard form of contract is sufficient to incorporate an arbitration clause, even if not from a trade association. The parties' awareness and acceptance of the standard terms made incorporation valid. The Court appointed an arbitrator to resolve the dispute."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Arbitration and Conciliation Act Incorporation of Arbitration Clause Section 7(5) Arbitrator Appointment Standard Terms and Conditions Contract Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login