Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-18 dismissed

ITC LIMITED vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA IV

Bench: 3 — Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that refund claims under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be entertained without prior modification of the assessment or self-assessment order through appropriate proceedings under Section 128 (appeals) or other relevant provisions. Although the Finance Act 2011 deleted the phrase 'in pursuance of an order of assessment' from Section 27 and introduced self-assessment procedures, this does not enlarge refund rights. Self-assessment constitutes an order of assessment under the amended definition in Section 2(2). Refund proceedings are execution in nature, not appellate; the refund officer cannot reassess or sit in appeal over the original assessment. The appeals filed by both ITC Limited and the Union of India were dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's view that assessments must be challenged through appeal before refund claims are considered.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Customs Law Excise Law Refund Claims Self-Assessment Import Duty Assessment and Reassessment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login