Breaking Legal Update: Supreme Court Closes Chapter on Historic Bofors Payoff Case
New Delhi · Friday, 21 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-07 dismissed

JAGDISH CHAND vs STATE OF HARYANA

Bench: 3 — Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Jagdish Chand and Mishri Devi, parents-in-law, were convicted of dowry death (Section 304-B IPC) and cruelty (Section 498-A IPC) following the death of their daughter-in-law, Shanti Devi, from burn injuries in 1994. The deceased had been ill-treated and faced repeated dowry demands during her marriage of fewer than seven years. The trial court sentenced them to 10 years' imprisonment; the High Court reduced the sentence to 7 years. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence, holding that all three statutory ingredients for dowry death were established: the death occurred within seven years of marriage, cruelty was inflicted for dowry, and the death resulted from burns. The statutory presumption under Section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act was drawn against the appellants.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Dowry Death Evidence Domestic Cruelty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login