Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-14 allowed

K. Kishan vs Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

This case addresses whether the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code can be used against a company with an unpaid arbitral award where a challenge to that award is pending. The Supreme Court held that when a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award is pending, a genuine dispute exists regarding the debt. An insolvency application must be rejected under Section 9(5) if the debtor has disputed the debt. The Court emphasized that the Code cannot be used prematurely to enforce operational debts or to bypass other adjudicatory processes, and that disputed debts—including those challenged by pending petitions—are outside the Code's scope for insolvency initiation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Arbitration Disputed Debt Operational Debt Corporate Insolvency Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login