Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-14 allowed

K. Kishan vs Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

A company (KCPL) received an arbitral award against it for Rs 1.71 crores and subsequently filed a Section 34 petition to challenge the award. The creditor then initiated insolvency proceedings under the Code. The Supreme Court held that a pending Section 34 petition constitutes a 'dispute' of the operational debt, preventing insolvency proceedings. The Code cannot bypass debt adjudication under the Arbitration Act. A dispute need not be likely to succeed; it need only be plausible and not spurious. Cross-claims pending in the arbitral challenge further support the disputed nature. The Court reversed the lower tribunals and allowed the appeals, holding insolvency applications must be rejected when disputes exist.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Arbitration Operational Debt Dispute Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login