Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-02-13 partly_allowed

K. KRISHNAMURTHY vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, Manmohan

In Brief

A taxpayer admitted undisclosed income of ₹2,27,65,580 during a search and paid tax with interest thereon, but later disclosed additional income of ₹2,49,90,000 during assessment. The Supreme Court held that Section 271AAA(2)'s three conditions—admission, substantiation, and timely tax-interest payment—must all be satisfied to escape penalty. Penalty at 10% is not leviable on the first amount (conditions met) but is leviable on the second amount (not admitted during search). The Court clarified that "found in the course of search" has wide amplitude and includes documents obtained as a result of investigation triggered by the search.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Penalty Provisions Search and Seizure Undisclosed Income Statutory Interpretation Administrative Discretion Tax Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login