Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-09 partly_allowed

Kalluri Venkata Narasimha Rao @ Narsinga Rao & Anr vs Land Acquisition Officer and Sub

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Kalluri Venkata Narasimha Rao and another appealed against the High Court's decision in a land acquisition matter concerning compensation and deductions. The appellants disputed two issues: the denial of compensation for wells on the property and the 60% deduction for development charges. The Supreme Court held that no further compensation for wells was justified as the appellants provided no evidence and the wells were in dilapidated condition. However, the Court reduced the development charge deduction from 60% to 30% of the land value, as the location was a residential area with good amenities and even the Land Acquisition Collector had assessed development costs at only 30%."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Development Charges Property Valuation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login