Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-29 allowed

Kalpana Vyas vs Raj Kumar Rangwani

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A landlady filed an eviction petition against her tenant under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, claiming personal bona fide need to construct and occupy the premises. The Rent Tribunal dismissed the petition, finding she had alternative accommodation. On appeal, the Rent Appellate Tribunal reversed this decision and granted eviction. The tenant then obtained a writ petition, which the High Court allowed, restoring the Rent Tribunal's dismissal. The Supreme Court held the High Court erred by not remanding the matter for fresh consideration of the crucial bona fide need issue. The Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the Rent Appellate Tribunal for a proper decision on merits within six months, focusing specifically on whether the landlady's stated need was genuine and bona fide.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Rent Control Eviction Bona Fide Need Landlord and Tenant Writ Jurisdiction Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login