Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-07 dismissed

Kandla Export Corporation & Anr vs OCI Corporation & Anr

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that an appeal against a judgment enforcing a foreign arbitral award cannot be filed under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act 2015, even where the award exceeds Rs. 1 crore. Section 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996—which governs appeals in foreign award enforcement—provides appeals only against orders *refusing* to enforce awards, not against orders *allowing* enforcement. This special provision is exhaustive and self-contained, excluding the general Commercial Courts appeal remedy. Allowing such appeals would contradict both statutes' objects: speedy dispute resolution and expeditious enforcement of international commercial awards. The doctrine of harmonious construction requires the special statute (Arbitration Act) to prevail over the general statute (Commercial Courts Act) in its field.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Commercial Courts Enforcement of Foreign Awards Appellate Jurisdiction Statutory Construction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login