Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-20 allowed

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY vs PRINCIPAL SIR SYED INSTITUTE FOR TECHNICAL STUDIES

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta, Aniruddha Bose

In Brief

The Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission issued a tariff notification segregating Self-Financing Educational Institutions (SFEIs) into a higher "Commercial" tariff category, while Government and Government-Aided institutions received Non-Domestic rates. SFEIs challenged this as arbitrary and violating Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The High Court Division Bench struck down the differentiation. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the Commission could lawfully differentiate based on the 'purpose' of supply. State-funded institutions serve tax-payer-supported social welfare, while SFEIs are self-financing with different student demographics. Both being educational does not preclude separate tariff treatment. The Court upheld the Commission's exercise as neither showing undue preference nor unlawful discrimination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Energy Law Regulatory Law Administrative Law Tariff Determination Education Law Consumer Rights Natural Justice Quasi-judicial Functions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login