Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-07-21 allowed

KHURSHEED AHMAD CHOHAN vs UNION OF TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. ETC

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

A serving police constable was allegedly subjected to brutal custodial torture at a Joint Interrogation Centre in Kupwara, resulting in complete genital mutilation, pepper burns, electric shocks, and fractures. Instead of investigating these allegations, the police registered a counter-FIR against the victim for attempted suicide under Section 309 IPC. The High Court declined to grant relief, directing only a preliminary inquiry. The Supreme Court held that the allegations clearly disclosed cognizable offences mandating immediate FIR registration under the settled law in Lalita Kumari. Finding the medical evidence conclusively established torture impossible to be self-inflicted and observing systematic cover-up by local police, the Court transferred the investigation to the CBI as constitutionally imperative. The counter-FIR was quashed as manifestly mala fide. The appellant was awarded ₹50 lakhs compensation for violation of Article 21.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Custodial Torture Police Atrocity Fundamental Rights Article 21 FIR Registration CBI Investigation Compensation Abuse of Process Medical Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login