Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-02-16 partly_allowed

Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Limited vs Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors

Bench: 3 — S. A. Bobde, A. S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian

In Brief

Kotak Mahindra Bank acquired a debt from IFCI Ltd. against respondents who defaulted on a Rs.145 crore loan. The DRT issued a recovery certificate for the remaining amount. When respondents appealed to the DRAT, they sought waiver of the mandatory 50% pre-deposit required under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, citing substantial land acquisition compensation already received. The High Court granted complete waiver. The Supreme Court held that pre-deposit is mandatory with no power for complete waiver; only reduction from 50% to minimum 25% is permissible. The Court modified the DRAT order to require 25% pre-deposit and set aside the High Court's order granting full waiver.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Debt Recovery Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act Appellate Procedure Pre-Deposit Banking Regulation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login