Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-09 allowed

KUSUMBEN INDERSINGH DHUPIA vs SUDHABEN BIHARILALJI BHAIYA

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

A plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction was dismissed for default, following which the plaintiff applied for restoration under Order IX, Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The Trial Court and High Court rejected the restoration application, finding the plaintiff uninterested in pursuing the matter based on a single absence. The Supreme Court, reviewing the court register, found the plaintiff had attended nearly all prior hearings despite court delays. The Court held that consistent attendance demonstrates genuine interest and set aside the dismissals. The suit was restored and the Trial Court was directed to accord both parties adequate opportunity and expedite the trial."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Restoration of Suit Dismissal for Default Limitation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login