Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 dismissed

Larsen and Toubro Limited Scomi Engineering Bhd vs Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

A Mumbai monorail contract involved an un-incorporated consortium comprising L&T (Indian) and Scomi Engineering Bhd (Malaysian). The consortium sought arbitration under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, arguing the case was an international commercial arbitration. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that a consortium constitutes a single legal entity (an 'association' under Section 2(1)(f)(iii), not Section 2(1)(f)(ii)) and cannot be treated as separate entities. Since the consortium's central management and control was exercised in India—with the Indian company as lead partner, its appointee chairing the supervisory board, and the office in Mumbai—no international commercial arbitration existed. The matter must proceed in domestic courts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration International Commercial Arbitration Consortium Section 2(1)(f) Arbitration Act Jurisdiction Central Management and Control Unincorporated Association

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login